Legal Action and Impact
Twenty-two state attorneys general filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging the 's decision to cap indirect research funding at 15%, arguing it violates the Administrative Procedure Act and Congressional intent.
The lawsuit underscores the potential "immediate and devastating" effects on research infrastructure, including layoffs, halted clinical trials, and disrupted ongoing research programs.
Reactions and Implications
Critics, including university officials and scientists, describe the funding cuts as draconian, fearing significant setbacks in medical research and innovation, particularly in areas like cancer and heart disease.
Proponents argue the cuts aim to reduce "out-of-control overhead costs," with some viewing it as a necessary measure to ensure taxpayer dollars are effectively utilized.